Protected Presentation
▸ LIVE PREP VI Internal RESTRICTED Run of Show / Final
DPAA Stage 2026 — 15:00 Runtime

Real-world attention
the final step in true
omni-channel impact.

The day VI stops being a media network and becomes the infrastructure layer the entire industry plans against. A category-defining manifesto, a partner who validates it, and the brand that proved it.

Total Runtime
15:00
On Stage
3
Manifesto Beats
5
Lines That Must Land
3
SECTION 01
› The Brief

Pre-Work & Theme

The Thesis

VI is no longer a media network. VI is infrastructure.

For nearly 15 years, VI's attention data lived inside our walls — proving our own network. Today, that data leaves the building. It becomes part of the cross-channel currency the buy-side already uses to price every other medium. Even if you never buy a single VI screen, VI's data is now shaping how the entire industry plans, measures, and values attention.

The stage talk doesn't announce a product launch. It declares a category shift. The audience leaves the room understanding that the elevator — the largest transit system on earth — is now part of the omnichannel attention pie, normalized into Adelaide's currency, validated by a brand who proved it works without any custom build.

▸ The Three Lines That Must Land
VI is no longer a media network. VI is infrastructure.

VI's data is now industry data.

On behalf of VI, it's my honor to recognize the work.
Format

Moderated Panel

You moderate. Two guests on stage with you — Adelaide rep and Skip rep. You speak ~5 min total across opening manifesto, two pivots, and close. They carry ~8 min combined. Sizzle + recognition close out the remaining time.

Speaking ratio: Moderator 5 / Adelaide 4 / Skip 4 / Sizzle + Close 2.

Tone

Declarative, Not Promotional

This is a category statement, not a pitch. Icons hold court. They don't sell. Every line in the manifesto is engineered to declare, not argue. The audience experiences a transformation, not a presentation.

Volume map: beats loud and planted, bridges quieter and conversational. The redefinition line gets the deepest silence.

The Structural Arc

Declaration → Proof → Reveal → Redefinition → Detonation

The manifesto is built in five beats, each shorter and harder than the last. By Beat 4 the room is leaning in. By Beat 5 they sit in silence. Each beat is connected by a single-line bridge that gives the room a breath without breaking the rhythm.

  • Beat 1 — Thesis. Attention is the leading indicator. Impressions are noise without a listener.
  • Beat 2 — Why Elevators. Elevators are the largest transit system on earth. Vertical transit. Captive. Compounding.
  • Beat 3 — Where We Are. 9,000 screens. 3 countries. Legislated to 27,000. Government-backed.
  • Beat 4 — Redefinition. Not a media network. Infrastructure.
  • Beat 5 — The News. Data leaves the building. Industry data now.

Pre-Stage Lock List

  • Manifesto lines memorized cold — opening sentence, tree question, leading-indicator chain, redefinition pair, news landing, recognition line.
  • Government funding handled — confirm with Barry whether he covers it in his host intro. If yes, "as Barry mentioned" stays in. If no, deploy the 30-sec backup.
  • Adelaide pre-brief locked — three questions aligned, "missing piece / VI closes it" landing confirmed, comfortable as partnership not measurement provider.
  • Skip pre-brief locked — three numbers in sequence memorized, "vertical transit" cue understood, reporting URL confirmed against the deck.
  • Logistics — sizzle cued, lighting cues set, mic levels for three speakers, recognition object positioned within arm's reach, photographer briefed.
SECTION 02
› The Arc

Timeline Summary

15 Minutes, Mapped

How the room moves through the segment

The audience experiences this in five emotional beats: curiosity (welcome + intros) → conviction (manifesto) → validation (Adelaide) → proof (Skip + sizzle) → elevation (close). Each handoff is a clean baton pass, not a transition speech.

TIME
SEGMENT
OWNER
0:00 → 1:00
Welcome & Intros
Moderator
1:00 → 4:15
The Manifesto — 5 Beats + Bridges
Moderator
4:15 → 8:15
Adelaide Q&A — 3 Questions
Adelaide
8:15 → 12:00
Skip Q&A — 3 Questions + Sizzle Setup
Skip
12:00 → 13:00
Sizzle — Skip × VI Winnipeg Work
Screen
13:00 → 14:30
Stage Moment — Held Detail
Moderator + Skip
14:30 → 15:00
The Close
Moderator
Five Hard Pauses

The silences that do the work

  • After "hope dressed up as data" — 2 sec.
  • After "Measure impressions, and you're guessing" — 2 sec.
  • Between "VI is no longer a media network" and "VI is infrastructure" — 2 sec.
  • After "VI's data is now industry data" — 3 sec.
  • After the sizzle ends — 3 sec before speaking.
Handoff Choreography

Each baton pass

  • Manifesto → Adelaide: "And nobody knows more about turning attention into a number than Adelaide."
  • Adelaide → Skip: "Standards only matter when smart brands actually plan against them."
  • Skip → Sizzle: "Here's the work that did it."
  • Sizzle → Stage Moment: 3 sec silence, then drop voice.
  • Stage Moment → Close: photo beat, count to three.
SECTION 03
› The Script

Full Stage Run of Show

Welcome & Intros / 0:00 → 1:00
"Good [morning / afternoon]. Thank you, Barry, and thank you all for being here.

I'm Nicolette — Nikki — President and Co-Founder of Vertical Impression. For the next 15 minutes, three of us are going to talk about real-world attention — and the final step in true omni-channel impact.

To my [right/left], Jordan Weiers, Director of Partnerships at Adelaide — the cross-channel attention currency the buy-side runs on.

And Eleanor Bothwell from Skip — one of the most attention-fluent brands in Canada.

I'll set the stage. They'll bring the proof. And we'll close with something special.

Let's go."
The Manifesto / 1:00 → 4:15
01 BEAT

The Thesis

~90 sec ▸ Declare
"For nearly 15 years, VI has been measuring real-world human attention.

Patented. Privacy-compliant. Anonymous video analytics. Not impressions served. Not plays delivered. Not completions assumed. What we measure is whether the message was seen. Fully watched. And remembered.

Here's why that matters — and I'm going to get philosophical on you for a second.

If a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?

That's not a riddle. It's an epistemology problem. And it's the exact problem at the heart of our industry. An impression is a tree falling in an empty forest. The ad served. The pixel fired. But if no human being was there to see it, to encode it in memory, to carry it out of that moment and into a decision later — it didn't make a sound. It didn't do anything. It was noise without a listener.

You don't take action on what you had the opportunity to see. You take action on what you actually saw. The ad has to land in a human mind. Otherwise it's hope dressed up as data.

Now — attention isn't the ultimate KPI. Sales are. Brand lift is. Lifetime value is. Those are the outcomes that matter.

But attention is the leading indicator. It's the upstream signal that predicts every one of them. No attention, no encoding. No encoding, no memory. No memory, no behavior. No behavior, no sale. Attention is where the chain starts. Measure attention right, and you can predict everything downstream. Measure impressions, and you're guessing."
"Which is why we built what we built."
02 BEAT

Why Elevators

~40 sec ▸ Prove
"We built our network around the one environment where attention isn't accidental — it's structural. The elevator.

Now — let me reframe what an elevator actually is. It's not a screen in a box. It's the largest transit system on earth. The vertical transit system. Captive. Eye-level. At least four times every single day. More people ride elevators every single day than cars, planes, and horizontal transit combined.

That's not a media buy. That's compounding interest on human attention. And we're measuring it in real time."
"So where does that put us today?"
03 BEAT

Where We Are

~20 sec ▸ Reveal
"9,000 screens. Three countries. Legislated to 27,000. And as Barry mentioned — recently backed by the government for global expansion of our vision technology."
"Which means we need to be honest about what VI actually is now."
04 BEAT

The Redefinition

~10 sec + pause ▸ Declare
"VI is no longer a media network.

VI is infrastructure."
Plant. Two seconds of silence. Hold.
"And infrastructure changes what's possible."
05 BEAT

The News

~30 sec ▸ Detonate
"Until today, VI's attention data lived inside our walls — proving our own network. That was then.

Today, VI's data leaves the building. It becomes part of the cross-channel currency the buy-side already uses to price every other medium. Which means even if you never buy a single VI screen, our data is now shaping how the industry plans, measures, and values attention.

VI's data is now industry data."
Pause. Three seconds. Do not fill it.
"And nobody knows more about turning attention into a number than Jordan and the team at Adelaide."
The Close / 14:30 → 15:00
"That's the future of media buying. Not impressions — attention. The leading indicator that tells you which dollar is doing the work. Every screen, every channel, one number.

VI's data is now industry data. Proud to be doing it with Jordan and the team at Adelaide. And proud to be doing it with believers like Eleanor and Skip who push us to prove it.

Because in the battle for attention, it's not just about being seen — it's about being remembered.

And when we deliver that — we all win.

So let's build boldly, measure bravely, and make every second count.

Thank you."
Step back from the mic. Walk to your seat. Let the applause carry.

Back-Pocket Q&A Defense

  • "The tree does make a sound — sound is just vibration."Sure, in physics. But we're not selling physics. We're selling behavior change. And behavior requires memory, and memory requires attention. An impression without a perceiver is acoustically real and commercially worthless.
  • "Isn't this just attention washing?"Some impressions accidentally land on attentive humans, sure. But you're paying for the whole forest hoping a few trees fall on listeners. Attention measurement is just paying for the trees that actually got heard.
  • "How do you handle privacy?"Patented anonymous video analytics. No facial recognition, no PII, no tracking. We measure structural signals — was a human present, did they attend, for how long.
SECTION 04
› Validation Layer

Adelaide — The Standard

The Frame

Why Adelaide Is On This Stage

Adelaide is the cross-channel attention currency the buy-side already runs on across CTV, digital, social, audio. Jordan Weiers — Director of Partnerships at Adelaide — is the right voice to validate VI on stage because he sits at the intersection of standards, integrations, and the agency relationships that decide where AU shows up next.

VI's role on stage is to declare the category shift. Adelaide's role is to validate it — and to give VI's data third-party credibility without VI having to claim it.

This is not a measurement add-on. It's infrastructure. Adelaide should be introduced as a partnership, not a measurement provider. The word matters: it signals VI as a peer in defining the standard, not a client of it.

▸ Question 01 / Foundation
"Jordan — what does Adelaide actually do, and why does this moment matter?"
Coverage ▸ ~60 sec
  • Adelaide is the cross-channel attention currency the buy-side trusts
  • Measures attention across CTV, digital, social, audio — every channel except, until now, the physical world
  • Why "this moment" — the industry is finally pricing attention, not impressions, and the standards layer is where that shift becomes real
▸ Question 02 / The Gap
"You've measured attention across CTV, digital, social, audio for years. Why was the physical world the last piece to crack — and why was it so hard to close?"
Coverage ▸ ~90 sec
  • Physical world has no native digital signal — no pixel, no SDK, no completion event
  • Every previous OOH attempt was modeled, surveyed, panel-based, extrapolated — never first-party, never real-time, never at scale
  • Why VI's data was the unlock: patented, privacy-compliant, in-environment, at scale, real-time
  • This is where Adelaide gives VI's data its credibility — without VI claiming it.
▸ Question 03 / What It Unlocks
"So what can a media buyer do tomorrow that they couldn't do yesterday?"
Coverage ▸ ~60 sec
  • Plan elevator alongside CTV / digital / social on a single attention score
  • Allocate budget apples-to-apples across every channel for the first time
  • Move money toward attention, not impressions, with confidence
▸ Line to land → "OOH was the missing piece. VI's data is what closes it."
◆ Back-of-House Reference

Adelaide Talk Track — Hallway Conversion Lines

This is the commercial story underneath the stage talk. Do not deliver from stage. Use for pre-stage briefing with the Adelaide rep, hallway conversations after the panel, and anchoring your own thinking before Q&A.

Core positioning: VI is the only elevator network with Adelaide-verified attention quality, benchmarked against every channel agencies are already buying. Pairing VI inventory with Adelaide's AU (Attention Unit) score creates a defensible, agency-friendly omnichannel outcomes story.

Why Adelaide vs. Brainsights or others: Adelaide operates at impression-level inside the buy. It plugs into programmatic workflows, agency dashboards, and planning tools agencies already use. Brainsights is neuro/biometric, lab-based, panel-driven. Adelaide is actionable in a media plan; Brainsights isn't yet.

For Data/Measurement Leads (e.g. Christy @ Omnicom)

"We're already working with Adelaide on AU score standardization. The signal VI generates is calibrated to the same framework the industry is converging on. Our attention scores and search-lift correlations are structured outputs, designed to be ingested, not just read in a PDF. We want to be a data partner inside Omni, not a vendor outside it."

For Investment Leads (e.g. Pina)

"The AU scoring partnership gives you a third-party validation hook. This isn't proprietary black-box measurement. We're not asking for a bigger OOH line. We're asking for first right of refusal when the brief calls for a captive, high-attention residential or travel audience."

Universal "Why This Matters" Line

"Attention is the currency the industry is converging on. VI is the only physical-world environment calibrated to the same scoring framework as CTV, social, and digital video. That means apples-to-apples comparisons agencies can defend to clients."
Pivot to Skip

The Handoff

"So that's the standard. Standards only matter when smart brands actually plan against them. Eleanor — Skip has believed in attention before most people in this room used the word. Why elevators?"
SECTION 05
› The Proof

Skip — The Believer

The Frame

Why Skip Is On This Stage

Eleanor Bothwell and the Skip team ran existing OOH creative — including work originally built for Calgary transit — in Winnipeg elevators for one month. They tested the medium, not the creative. The medium delivered.

That means any brand already running OOH can do exactly what Skip did, using creative they already have. No new production. No bespoke build. The medium does the work.

That's the case for VI as infrastructure, not media. The story is the medium, not the creative. Skip stays on that beat. Existing creative, no bespoke build, the elevator did the work.

The Verified Data / Skip × VI Winnipeg / March 2026
Avg Attention Per View
5.46s
+5.9% vs network benchmark
vs Digital Benchmark
3.6x
Higher than digital baseline
vs Traditional OOH
2.7x
Higher than OOH baseline
Active Attention
68.2%
Eyes-on-screen, not passive
Brand Search Peak — MB
100/100
Google Trends full saturation, mid-flight
Best Demo — W 55+ WPG
6.39s
+24% vs network
Best Creatives — Tied
5.78s
YYC Transit CLEARBLUE & YYC DigitalOffice — +12.3% vs network
The Three Questions for Eleanor
▸ Question 01 / Why Elevators
"Why elevators — and why Winnipeg?"
Coverage ▸ ~60 sec
  • Skip is attention-first — "if you don't earn the look, you don't earn the order"
  • Winnipeg is a competitive food-delivery market where every percentage point of awareness matters
  • VI's reach into Winnipeg residential is what's missing from most plans — daily, captive, eye-level
  • Attention-first medium for an attention-first brand
▸ Question 02 / The Creative Reality★ KILLER
"You didn't build new creative for elevators — you ran existing OOH work, including creative originally built for Calgary transit. Transit creative running in… a different kind of transit system. Talk to us about that call."
Coverage ▸ ~45 sec
  • Skip wanted to test the medium, not the creative
  • Ran existing OOH including out-of-market transit creative
  • Setup planted — let Eleanor claim "vertical transit" naturally in her answer
  • The bet: if it works for transit, it'll work for vertical transit
▸ Phrase to land from her side → "vertical transit"
▸ Question 03 / What Happened★ HERO NUMBERS
"So you ran existing OOH creative in Winnipeg elevators for one month. What did you see?"
Three Numbers, Ascending ▸ ~90 sec
  • 01 ▸ "5.46 seconds of attention — 3.6x higher than digital, 2.7x higher than traditional OOH benchmarks."
  • 02 ▸ "68% of those views were active attention — eyes on screen, not background exposure."
  • 03 ▸ "And brand search in Manitoba peaked at 100 — full saturation — mid-flight. The medium moved the market."
▸ Order matters → Leading indicator → quality → outcome
▸ Sizzle Setup
"And here's the work that did it — existing OOH creative, no bespoke build, running in elevators. Roll it."
Coverage ▸ ~15 sec
  • Eleanor sits back, watches with the audience, doesn't talk
  • Sizzle runs ~60 sec
  • Moderator returns to mic after 3-sec silence
Eleanor Meeting / Open Decisions

▸ Five items to lock with Eleanor before stage day. Bring this list. Run top to bottom. Lock each before moving on.

DECISION 01 / Dashboard Labels

Should "YYC Transit" file names show on dashboard view?

Option A — Keep dashboard clean
Current state. Clean thumbnails, no Calgary tells. Eleanor does all the work explaining the pun verbally. Riskier, bigger payoff if delivered well.
Option B — Restore "YYC Transit" labels for panel segment
Audience reads the file names during the sizzle. They figure out "that's Calgary transit creative" before Eleanor confirms it. Lower-risk, double-impact.
Do you want the dashboard to telegraph "YYC Transit" visually so the audience figures it out before you confirm it — or do you want the room to hear it from you cold?
DECISION 02 / Hero Numbers

Confirm the three numbers in sequence

Option A — Keep all three
Recommended. Leading indicator → quality → outcome chain.
Option B — Drop #3 (brand search)
If Eleanor is nervous about implying causation.
Option C — Swap #3 for something else
Anything cleaner from the reporting URL she'd rather lead with.
Option D — Soften #3
Use "correlated with" instead of "moved."
Are you comfortable with these three numbers in this order? Anything you'd swap, drop, or soften?
DECISION 03 / Vertical Transit Phrase

Who claims the metaphor?

Option A — Moderator sets up, Eleanor claims "vertical transit"
Strongest version. Brand voice owns the metaphor. Requires Eleanor to be comfortable saying it on stage.
Option B — Moderator names "vertical transit" directly
Safer fallback. Less powerful (vendor coining > brand coining).
Option C — Skip the metaphor entirely
Q2 becomes more general — "you ran existing OOH creative, talk to us about that call."
Is "vertical transit" a phrase you'd say naturally on stage, or do you want the moderator to plant it directly? Or skip the metaphor entirely?
◆ Held Detail — Moderator Eyes Only

Stage Moment — Decision 04

This decision concerns a closing moment that has not yet been disclosed to the guest. Read only if you are the moderator. Do not include this section when sharing the document externally.

After the sizzle ends, Eleanor will receive the inaugural VI Attention Champion Award. Two ways to handle her advance knowledge:

Option A — Surprise on stage. Maximum emotional payoff. Authentic reaction = great photo, great clip. Risk: shock can cause under-thanking VI / Adelaide / her team; representing Skip in the moment, an unprepared thank-you reflects on the brand.

Option B — Pre-brief, with prepared but natural thank-you. She prepares a 20–30 sec thank-you. Cleaner, more intentional acknowledgment of VI + Adelaide + her team. Loses the "genuine surprise" beat. Sharper, more professional moment.

Recommendation: Option B. A polished thank-you serves Skip better than a stunned one. Audiences can't tell the difference between "great surprise reaction" and "great prepared moment" when it's delivered well.

If pre-brief: the ask is "keep it under 30 seconds, please thank Adelaide and the partnership moment too — not just VI."

The Setup Script

"Skip didn't just buy a campaign. They bet on a thesis. They ran their existing OOH creative — work originally built for Calgary transit — in Winnipeg elevators. They tested the medium. And the medium did the rest.

That's not a media plan. That's leadership."

The Announcement

"Which is why, today, VI is doing something we've never done before.

We're launching the inaugural VI Attention Champion Award — an annual program recognizing the people and brands moving this industry from impressions to attention. The ones who didn't wait for the standard. The ones who built against it before it existed.

And there is no one more deserving of being the first than the team in front of you tonight."

The Presentation

"Eleanor — on behalf of everyone at VI, it is my honor to present you with the inaugural VI Attention Champion Award.

Thank you for betting on the thesis. Thank you for proving it. And thank you for setting the standard everyone else now has to clear."
Hand the award. Photo beat. Count to three before speaking.
DECISION 05 / Creative Backstory

Bulletproof the Q2 narrative

Confirm 01
"YYC Transit CLEARBLUE" and "YYC Transit BACKUP" — were these actually originally built for Calgary transit (buses / shelters / etc.)?
Confirm 02
The Clearblue creative — is this a real Skip × Clearblue co-marketing creative, or is there context the audience would need?
Confirm 03
"WPG Existing" creative — purpose-built for Winnipeg or also repurposed? (It was the worst performer — strengthens the "medium does the work" story IF purpose-built.)
Walk us through which creatives came from where, so we're bulletproof on stage if anyone asks for specifics.

Lower-Priority Items to Confirm with Eleanor

  • Skip's preferred title for Eleanor on the slide / lower-third
  • Skip leadership / team to acknowledge from stage (optional name-drop)
  • Anything Eleanor specifically does not want asked
  • NDA / public-vs-private flags on reporting URL data beyond what's listed above
  • Arrival time, sound check, mic preference (lav vs handheld)